Arthur Miller and his Distorted Historical Accuracies :: American America History

Arthur Miller and his Distorted Historical AccuraciesIn 1953, Arthur Miller wrote his far-famed frolic The Crucible, in response to a fear of Communism that had substantial in the United States during that decade. The Red Scare, as it was later called by historians was led by Senator Joseph McCarthy, whose paranoia of a communist takeover spread with the nation like a wildfire. Men and women alike fell dupe to McCarthys pointed finger and as a result of this hysteria, were mostly deported from the country, their careers and lives ruined. Some wall today that McCarthys plan had been to use the fear of the American people to ramble his enemies out of office and gain power himself. Whatever McCarthys motives may oblige been, Arthur Miller realized the senators ludicracy when he attempted to accuse the President himself to be Communist. Miller and the rest of the American people drew the line and McCarthy was seen a fraud. By the time the rest of the public had came to this realiz ation, Millers play was written. The Crucible is a play in which Arthur Miller parallels events of the capital of Oregon witch trials of 1692 to the problems that were plaguing his own society. The direction that most readers today bring out of the play is that history has a way of repeating itself. Millers play was an extreme hit upon release and win a Tony award. The play is so popular today that many teachers in secondary schools use it to base their lesson around when teaching their students about 1692 Salem and there are multimedia activities based on Salem through with(predicate) The Crucibles view. Miller is often asked to speak at events where similar witch hunts occur, playacting as a sort of expert on the subject of puritan Salem and acts of hysteria.The question is, why is Arthur Miller revered by so many as the man to ask regarding the Salem Witch trials when his play had many inaccuracies, some very obvious? Millers play is not a historical account of the events in 1692 Salem, but rather a black market of fiction. It is important to realize that what Miller wrote is not fact by unveil where his play is historically flawed. Some of the more important discrepancies are discussed on a lower floorBy examining Millers main plot relationship between characters Abigail Williams and John Proctor, we publish many discrepancies, mainly that there was no relationship at all.