The 1996 Margin of Victory for U.S. House Incumbents :: Politics Political Election Government Essays

The 1996 Margin of Victory for U.S. House IncumbentsIn 1996, the American public reelected 357 members to the United States House of Representatives of those running for reelection, 95% succeeded. several(prenominal) congressmen received a large margin of success over their policy-making opponents, confusable to election results of the past. Trends in American politics have been the arouse reelection rates of House incumbents as well as large margins of victory over challengers. The purpose of this paper is to examine the factors influencing incumbents margin of victory in the 1996 Congressional elections. Literature Review Most recent research concentrates on the increasing trend at all levels of American government toward full(prenominal) reelection success. Paul Jacob explains that today, challengers have an exceedingly difficult time trying to bastinado an incumbent. For example, incumbents who sought reelection in the 1988 general election had a 96% success rate and 98% in 1990. Though the percentage decreased in 1992 because of House scandals, the general election rate for incumbents still remained high at 93% (Jacob, 1994 30). This is non a new phenomenon as approximately 92% of all incumbent representatives have been reelected since World War II. Even in a year with a lower percentage such as 1992, Davidson and Oleszek emphasize that turnover in the House resulted more from retirements (many involuntary) than from electoral defeats (Davidson, 1994 63). Drawing upon existing literature, Alford and Brady in Congress Reconsidered have suggested four main reasons for this reelection phenomenon. The reasons atomic number 18 as follows (1) congressional district lines drawn to favor incumbents (2) increase resources of incumbent members (3) weak congressional challengers and (4) weak troupe identification of voters (150 and 151). The latter three storys are support by current research however, the first theory is not. By examining similar trends i n the Senate, which does not use district lines, researchers have concluded that congressional district lines do not favor incumbents and are not an explanation for high incumbency reelection rates (151). However, much research has demonstrated that incumbents are usually rewarded on election days because of numerous factors. These factors include congressional perquisites such as campaign funding, franking privileges, and extensive media coverage. As a result, they much face weaker challengers because of such effective use of these perquisites (Erikson and Wright, 1993 99, 101). Finally, American voters do not strongly identify with one party as in the past. much people are declaring themselves independent, and consequently, they are voting for the individual rather than for the party with whom they identify.