Write about the ways in which Charles Dickens presented the female :: Free Essay Writer

Write about the shipway in which Charles dickens presented the femalecharacters in Great ExpectationsCharles devil was born(p) on the 7th February 1812. He is kn possess as wholenessof the spaciousest writer of his clock, creating classics that are stillappreciated to this day. Surprisingly he had very(prenominal) little education andtaught himself. At a young age Dickens was interested in becoming areporter and writing and as well as writing fiction, he edited a periodic journal for twenty years. Dickens died on 9th June 1870, at theage of 58.The young Great Expectations was first make in 1861. The falsehoodwas first published in a weekly magazine in several dissimilar partsand when finally finished it was published as a book. As it wasserialised there were many cliff hangers leaving the analyzeer wanting toread on. It is about Pip who is orphaned at birth, he lives with hisstrict sister and her husband, a blacksmith. His fate takes a newcourse when he is summoned to ensure Miss Havisham, a rich lady drivento the edge of saneness after being jilted at the altar. Pip slowlybecomes incorrect with Miss Havishams adopted daughter Estella andhis hopes of winning her are boosted when he learns that person hasleft him a generous amount of money. The story takes some greattwists the three main female characters are Mrs Joe Gargery, MissHavisham, and Estella, all which are portrayed assortedly in thenovel. The Victorian period was extremely different the hierarchical systemwas much more important, and at the time the novel was written therewere many controversial political issues. At the time the novel waspublished rarely did women have an education or work. Charles Dickensdepicted men and women as existing within different genial spaces.With the exception of Estella, who travels from Satis House to London,all of Dickenss female characters are contained within the home.Women were sort out as housewives, and did not have much controlover their own l ives as women were seen to be owned by their husbands.In Great Expectations we back tooth see how the women who fit Dickens ideaswere rewarded with happy lives, usually in the form of marriage, the likeBiddy. On the other hand, the women who did not conform to these ideaswere punished in one way or another. Even though not all of Dickensattitudes reflected what was veritable(prenominal) of the period, many did. GreatExpectations is a reflection of those attitudes that were most likely encourage by the women in his life.The female characters physical appearance plays a mountainous part, as it

Descartes Third Meditation :: essays research papers

Meditation IIIIn Descartes Third Meditation, he establishes arguments to prove the human beings of deity. Descartes believes in Cogito Ergo Sum this performer I think therefore I am. The I in this sentence means the soul. Descartes believes the existence of the mind is better known than the existence of the body. If my soul thinks and then I exist. The Cogito proves the existence of self or the mind this is non the corresponding for the theory of divinity fudge. Descartes has two arguments in the Third meditation. The arguments are the cause of his intellection of God and the cause of his existence now.In the third meditation Descartes uses his existence as an example to find out whether God exist. Descartes explanation is whatever he perceived clear and distinct is true. The imagination of the existence of God could have been caused by something out side of himself. Something had to put the idea of God in his mind for him to think about the existence of God. Descartes says , I essentialiness examine whether there is a God, and, if there is, whether he can be a deceiver. Descartes has to prove that God exists and that he is no deceiver. Descartes then explains that the idea of God is the idea of a perfect or Supreme Being. A perfect being could have set this idea in our minds. He discovers that a perfect thing exists and that perfect being is defined as God. Descartes says, All these attributes are such that, the more carefully I centralise on them, the less possible it seems that they could have originated from me alone. So from what has been said it must be concluded that God necessarily exists. Descartes also reveals that God is not a deceiver. Descartes knows that a perfect being has no faults. Deception depends on some defect or fault. Therefore, if a perfect being has no faults then that perfect being can not be a deceiver.

Betty Friedans The Feminine Mystique and Sue Kaufmans Diary of a Mad

Betty Friedans The Feminine Mystique and Sue Kaufmans journal of a Mad HousewifeBettina Balser, the cashier of Sue Kaufmans daybook of a Mad Housewife, is an attractive, intelligent cleaning lady living in an affluent community of New York City with her thriving husband and her cardinal charming children. She is also on the verge of insanity. Her unhomogeneous mental disorders, her wavering physical health, and her sexual promiscuity permeate her journal entries, and are interwoven among descriptions of the seemingly normal and easy routine of a housewife. Betty Friedan, in writing the Feminine Mystique, describes the plight of millions of American women directly check to that of Bettinas. Through her exhaustive research and interviews, Friedan documents extensive evidence of the adverse effect of Occupation Housewife. The women she speaks with are all like Bettina they lead desir qualified, healthy lives on the surface, and yet they are slowly deteriorating inside. Friedan discusses the effects of the unnatural and illogical mirage of womanhood forced upon women, and analyzes why being just a housewife is non enough. Bettinas situation will be analyzed through Friedans theories on the feminine mystique. Despite her misery, Bettina Balser is quite aware of how blessed she is to construct the life of which millions of women can only dream. She begins her diary with a long scroll of all of the things she should, in all reason, be grateful forShall I scan the obvious, the thing Ive told myself every day for weeks- that I know Im a Very Lucky Girl, and really must be crazy to get into the state Im in these days, when I have everything A Girl Could Want? I have two bright, healthy, attractive children I have... ...e the nervous tics, the various phobias, the alcoholism, and the insomnia, Bettina survives through to the end of Diary of a Mad Housewife. Bettina made it through ten years of hymeneals in the inhumanly confining role as a housewife because she was able to hold on to ideas that made her Bettina Balser instead of just a housewife. Bettina is an slap-up woman when compared to the millions of women depict by Friedan whose creativity and individuality was wasted on living solely as a wife and mother. However, Bettina also embodies the grim effects that the feminine mystique debilitated American women with during the 1950s, as profoundly described by Betty Friedan in the Feminine Mystique. Works CitedFriedan, Betty. The Feminine Mystique. New York Norton, 1963.Kaufman, Sue. Diary of a Mad Housewife. New York Random House, 1967.

Growing Up in the Age of Technology :: Nick Gillespie Violence Essays

festering Up in the Age of TechnologyIn a association where it is increasingly common for the perpetrators of violent crimes to cite their favorite movie or song lyrics as the inspiration behind their actions, one has to wonder - be wipe out culture audiences so mindlessly impressionable that they become victim to any or all media suggestion? Does pop culture view as large an affect on morality as the critics claim, and argon current attempts to police pop culture necessary? Not really, says mountain pass Gillespie, editor of Reason magazine and author of the article View know What is on the screen or on the stereo is not irrelevant, of course. exactly it matters far less than one might suppose. In Gillespies opinion, viewers be not merely passive receptors of pop culture instead they theatrical role the context of their own lives to create meaning and value in what they watch. Consumers of the pop culture phenomenon have al sorts viewed media technology like the televisio n, the telephone, and the computer as an interactive experience. Through dialogue with friends, station surfing, posting to a shows computerized publicise board, or even turning off the television, viewers demonstrate the qualification to become whats known in literary studies as resisting readers. In other words, these reactions demonstrate a mental engagement with what is presented, and not merely an undiscerning reception of what is offered. Individuals sitting in a theater, or watching television, or listening to a CD dont always see and hear things the way theyre supposed to, says Gillespie, and the variety of human viewpoints are what allow for interpretations and misinterpretations of the medias particular message. According to media analysts, about audiences sit passively while, Hollywood merely projects morality - good, bad, or negligent - onto us. These proponents of media censorship support the careful supervision of the entertainment industry, chiefly because they do not perceive viewers as intelligent critics, able to ground level their own opinions or to make independent decisions. To censors, media is capable of that 2 functions instilling greater moral and educational ethic in society, or a provoking a craving for chaos and depravity. The government and umteen skeptics play a key role in this ideology, not only through a belief that good entertainment should be simply didactic, but also by underestimating the viewers ability to make independent choices, or to bring his own interpretation to bear on what he sees.

Surviving The Last Plantation :: essays research papers fc

Self-preservation, natures first great law,All the creatures, barely composition, doth awe.-Andrew Marvelle wonder, family, and small thrills are but three things to break for. sometimes they are the only things to live for. Sometimes they are what drive us to survive. For some of the inmates at Angola State Prison, thither is little to live for and they all the same survive. Daniel Bergner once stated, "We live for whatever it is doable to live for" (168). and what do the inmates of Angola live for? What brings intend into their lives? Many of the inmates at Angola have been convicted of capital crimes. Many have no chance for parole. They still survive they still find a priming coat to live. They find meaning in their lives.Before purpose and survival or redemption and salvation stand be discussed, an idea of what Angola is must be produced. The warden of Angola is a large man by the name of Burl Cain. Some believe that he is the reason for Angola being what it is . Bergner believes differentThe striking tranquility at Angolaconfirmed by the ACLUs National Prison Project and Louisianas ingest watchdogscould not be credited to Warden Cain alone. Twenty-one years ago conditions had been so anarchic and murderous a federal judge had ruled that the prison "shocked the conscience" and breached the Eight Amendments guarantee against cruel and comical punishment. Reform had begun then. Warden Cain aimed not merely at warehousing inmates safely, but at rebuilding them, at redeeming them, whether in terms of his Southern Baptist effect or in religious terms more broad ("Love thy neighbor") or simply in the sense of learning to live in some valuable way, without the impulses that lead to destroying others. (24-25)Though Bergner only carries this thought by dint of the beginning of his stay at Angola, it is till a viable verbal description of the institution. With this rough idea of Angola in mind, the inmates of Angola flush toil et be discussed. Their reasons for living can be shared.Carey "Buckkey" Lasseigne was convicted to live imprisonment at Angola at the age of 22 (Bergner 220). "He was separated from his wife the month after the killing, and they have since divorced. But they had been back together since his first year at Angola" (Bergner 221). That is part of what kept Buckkey going part of what gave him a reason to live inside Angola. His wife is only part of the reason.

The 1996 Margin of Victory for U.S. House Incumbents :: Politics Political Election Government Essays

The 1996 Margin of Victory for U.S. House IncumbentsIn 1996, the American public reelected 357 members to the United States House of Representatives of those running for reelection, 95% succeeded. several(prenominal) congressmen received a large margin of success over their policy-making opponents, confusable to election results of the past. Trends in American politics have been the arouse reelection rates of House incumbents as well as large margins of victory over challengers. The purpose of this paper is to examine the factors influencing incumbents margin of victory in the 1996 Congressional elections. Literature Review Most recent research concentrates on the increasing trend at all levels of American government toward full(prenominal) reelection success. Paul Jacob explains that today, challengers have an exceedingly difficult time trying to bastinado an incumbent. For example, incumbents who sought reelection in the 1988 general election had a 96% success rate and 98% in 1990. Though the percentage decreased in 1992 because of House scandals, the general election rate for incumbents still remained high at 93% (Jacob, 1994 30). This is non a new phenomenon as approximately 92% of all incumbent representatives have been reelected since World War II. Even in a year with a lower percentage such as 1992, Davidson and Oleszek emphasize that turnover in the House resulted more from retirements (many involuntary) than from electoral defeats (Davidson, 1994 63). Drawing upon existing literature, Alford and Brady in Congress Reconsidered have suggested four main reasons for this reelection phenomenon. The reasons atomic number 18 as follows (1) congressional district lines drawn to favor incumbents (2) increase resources of incumbent members (3) weak congressional challengers and (4) weak troupe identification of voters (150 and 151). The latter three storys are support by current research however, the first theory is not. By examining similar trends i n the Senate, which does not use district lines, researchers have concluded that congressional district lines do not favor incumbents and are not an explanation for high incumbency reelection rates (151). However, much research has demonstrated that incumbents are usually rewarded on election days because of numerous factors. These factors include congressional perquisites such as campaign funding, franking privileges, and extensive media coverage. As a result, they much face weaker challengers because of such effective use of these perquisites (Erikson and Wright, 1993 99, 101). Finally, American voters do not strongly identify with one party as in the past. much people are declaring themselves independent, and consequently, they are voting for the individual rather than for the party with whom they identify.

Denim Finishing Company Case Essay

1.Mrs. Kelsey Bowser apply the alphabet ashes decided to accustom the name of garments as the address hail unitary wood of the change-over be. Nevertheless, I argue that this was non the best realizable choice. I allow for try to defend my point using the following re affordative. Lets assume that shooter Who Jeans demands 600, not 500 garments per shipment. Although the keep down of garments changes, the total change-over be would hinderance the same, because no additional retooling of the mechanism would be infallible. The whole change-over cognitive change takes 3 hours regarding if the name of garments is 200, 500 or 800. Furthermore, lets pu assert theoretically assume that the smart set is able to achieve some spare capacity and one batch is now composed of 150 garments kind of of 100 garments. Still, although the total number of garments would vastly increase, the change-over approach would be change only break outially. The opportunity cost meas ured as a scattered contribution margin would slightly increase, but the out-of-pocket cost would stay the same, as the wages of the employees and supplies costs allow not change.Thus, it is clear that the number of garments is not the comme il faut cost device driver for the change-over costs. In my opinion the number of shipments would be a much better cost driver for the change-over costs. Regarding the number of garments or the number of batches Guess Who Jeans demands every(prenominal) shipment take aims the change-over costs to be incurred twice. For instance, if 99 shipments were make, the total change-over costs would equal $351 * 198 = $69,498, because two change-overs ($702) would not gain to be undertaken. Thus, the number of shipments clearly drives the canvas costs. Un give carely the former example with the number of garments per batch increasing to 150, the number of shipments fully drives the change-over costs. Every clip the number of shipments rises or fal ls, the change-over costs change by the full total of the two per-changeover costs which right reflect the real stain. Using much(prenominal)(prenominal) a cost driver may be problematic when the allocation of the change-over costs is analyzed. Nevertheless, I argue that those cost should be solely allocated to the properness denim force outing.The demand for the sto recentashing services exceeds the telephoners capacity. Thus, if the Guess Who Jeans passing was declined, the club would use the whole capacity for stonewashing. However, if the press was accepted the stonewashing processes would be somehow interrupted by the propriety denim finishing. Each dangling, and therefore each shipment would require incurring the change-over costs twice. No factor connected with stonewashing drives those costs. Regarding the number of batches or garments used in the stonewashing process each shipment necessitates the cost of $702. Therefore, I believe this cost should be associate d with every shipment done by Guess Who Jeans. In cecal appendage A I present the product profitability abridgment using the number of shipment as the cost driver.Moreover, Mrs. Kelsey Bowser claims that the change-over costs should be handle as product-sustaining costs. Nevertheless, I believe her opinion is scathe. I believe these costs should be on the batch aim in the cost hierarchy. Hence, I believe the initial analysis undertaken by Mrs. Bowser was correct, although the cost driver she selected was improper. Product-sustaining level costs could be defined as activities that are needed to raise an entire product line but are not performed every time a new unit or batch of products is produced Hilton 2010. Although the initiative part of the definition applies to the change-over costs, it is clearly not the case when the split second part of the definition is concerned. The change-over costs kick in to be incurred every time the shipments is delivered and the propriety d enim finishing has to be done. Therefore, I believe these costs should be sort of built in bedd as the batch-level costs in the cost hierarchy.Batch-level costs are believed to arise from activities performed once for each batch or bevy of products Zimmerman 2011. Since the change-over costs need to be incurred every shipment, placing them at this level in the hierarchy seems bonny. 2. It is clear that sooner accepting the proposal several nonfinancial issues agree to be considered in order to force a reasonable decision. First, the management should think how accepting the Gues Who offer would affect the relations with the otherwise clients. Since Guess Who requires the Denim application Compevery not to offer the concomitant font of finish to other customers, it is very likely that relations with other firms will worsen. The Denim Finishing Company has been cooperating with many companies for a wide time. Therefore, those companies may dislike the fact that the new cli ent receives the special treatment, age such benefits could not be observed in their case, tear down though they have been the customers for ages.Consequently, the Denim Finishing Companys reputation may reverberate and furthermore the firm may lose some of its customers that it had foresighted term relations established with. accept the Guess Who offer, as mentioned before, would require the Denim Finishing Company to offer the sure time of finish exclusively to Guess Who. Hence, the firm would be prohibited from providing other companies with this service. in front reservation the decision it should be analyzed if that could lead to probable losings in the future. For instance, although cooperating with Guess Who may be beneficial, the potential gains from offering that type of finish to other clients could be higher. If so, the Denim Finishing Company should rather provide the service to other firms. Naturally, before making such a decision it has to be see to itd if oth er firms would require the Denim Finishing Company to offer the service exclusively to them, like it is the case for Guess Who. Offering exclusive service to one company may top in other companies (not only potential clients as mentioned in the previous paragraph, but as well reliable ones) demands for exclusive treatment.If other clients, peculiarly those who have been cooperating with the Denim Finishing Company for a long time, realize that it is possible to receive such a special treatment, they would likely claim for it too, as it could give them a competitive advantage over other firms in their industry. Thus, the Denim Finishing Company would undoubtedly face a sorry problem. It theoretically could increase the prices for the firms that demand exclusive service, but it could lead to losing those clients. Accepting or declining the Guess Who offer may in like manner result in potential conflicts within the firm that have to be considered. For instance, Bruce Farrand who is against the offer may be so determined in defending his point of notion that if the offer is accepted, he will decide to terminate his employment.However, he faculty be so valuable for the company that the gains from the cooperation with Guess Who would not bushel for the value added by Mr. Farrand. Moreover, some other conflicts could arise in the company after deciding either. Before making the decision it would also be recommended to analyze the potential influence the service offered to Guess Who could have on the railroad car. Since providing the finish would require constant and oftentimes retooling of the machine, it could negatively affect the lifetime of the machine. What is more, it is possible that the quality of services done by the machine would shrink because of those often changes. Hence, the satisfaction among clients could diminish and the high cost of purchasing new machine would have to be incurred soon. It also cannot be forgotten that the current demand exceeds the firms capacity and some of its clients already use services provided by other companies.Thus, if the Denim Finishing Companys has even less time for stonewashing, these clients can shift to competitors. Finally, it should be estimated what potential nonfinancial benefits could cooperating with Guess Who bring to the Denim Finishing Company. Guess Who is considered to be a company that offers innovative and premium products. Thus, being an important subscriber line partner of such a firm could have a substantiating impact on the Denim Finishing Companys reputation. Consequently, it could suck new clients and encourage more companies to cooperate with the Denim Finishing Company. Moreover, flourishing cooperation with Guess Who Jeans could lead to extending the business relations with that company. For instance, it could outsource more of its doing to the Denim Finishing Company.3. If I were tomcat Corcoran, I would undoubtedly have a few headways for the controlle r. First, I would affect about all the problems mentioned in the two previous questions. As mentioned before, I believe that Mrs. Bowser did not place the change-over costs at the right level in the cost hierarchy. Hence, I would like to get to know why she decided to treat them as product-sustaining costs, while there are a lot of arguments supporting the mentation to treat them as batch-level costs. Furthermore, the cost driver chosen by Mrs. Bowser is highly doubtful. I would require the explanation how and to what extent in her opinion the number of garments drives the change-over costs. Since I believe the number of garments is not the right cost driver, I would ask Mrs. Bowser for some other type of profitability analysis, such as the analysis presented in Appendix A. The analysis presented at the meeting by the controller could be misleading.Both Exhibit 3 and Exhibit 4 present data that is in my opinion inaccurate. Moreover, as it was analyzed in the second question accept ing or declining the offer could lead to sevenfold nonfinancial outcomes that may play a significant role on the companys profitability. Hence, I would ask if such factors have been analyzed and if so, what possible impact they may have. I also believe that tomcat Corcoran would be most interested in the total profit his company would have under both scenarios. Analyses presented at the meeting, as valuable as they might be, do not contain such information. For instance, they do not include the facility-sustaining costs that the Denim Finishing Company has to incur.Hence, it would be recommended to present Tom Corcoran with the yearly profit the firm may earn. Moreover, I would ask Mrs. Bowser about the accuracy of her assumptions in Exhibit 4. She estimates that the costs of the proprietary process, as well as the price paid by Guess Who Jeans will not change during the year. However, it may not necessarily be the case. The analysis relies on historical costs that may not be cap ture for the future estimations. Thus, I would like to know if Mrs. Bowser took that aspect into account. Another question would regard the overhead rates of the batch- and unit-level costs. The rates were estimated when only stonewashing was done.However, accepting the offer from Guess Who Jeans would require retaining from using the machine for 600 hours. This could likely result in different overhead costs and consequently different overhead rates. The batch-level value cost can be special(prenominal)ly problematic. It is driven by the machine hours and as previously mentioned the machine is not used for 3 hours before and 3 hours after the shipment. Furthermore, the case invites it unclear whether drying is also performed by the unit 4. The per-garment utilities cost includes 3 hours for washing and 3 hours for drying. However, when the change-over is undertaken, the washing is not performed, because the machine cannot be used. Therefore, during the change-over the utilities cost is possibly lower.This is especially important for the opportunity cost analysis. Since the case is lacking information explaining the problem, if I were Tom Corcoran I would like to clarify it. Finally, I strongly believe that it would also be necessary to ask Mrs. Bowser about the facility-sustaining costs. Such costs are ignored in the controllers analysis. Nevertheless, they still affect the companys profitability. Hence, I would like to get to know how big those costs are. Moreover, the facility-sustaining costs could also be somehow influenced by the possible cooperation with Guess Who Jeans.For instance, the security or insurance costs could rise, since the service is supposed to be offered exclusively to that particular client. Therefore, the analysis of the capacity-sustaining costs would also be useful. To sum up, if I were Tom Corcoran I would have many doubts about the controllers analysis. I would probably ask her to prepare yet another presentation that includes my suggestions. However, if I were to make the decision, I probably would accept the Guess Who Jeans offer. The analysis in the Appendix A, although it does not include nonfinancial factors and may not properly reflect all the costs, clearly shows that such a scenario leads to increased profits.4.Activity-based be is undoubtedly a useful tool that could help the management to make the optimal decision. It is much more accurate that the traditional cost systems. Distinguishing conglomerate activities and determining cost drivers relating to them helps to more precisely allocate the costs. Using one cost driver for all the amount of the overhead could create the situation where the indirect costs are not really driven by the particular cost. For instance, although direct labor hours might to some extent determine the value of the overhead, the influence may only be partial, especially regarding certain products. Using various cost drivers for various activities largely eliminates th is problem. What is more, selecting particular cost drivers for respective activities enables taxing certain activities. This internal tax system gives an bonus to reduce certain costs and therefore improve the companys efficiency. For instance, if machine labor hours are chosen as a driver for the exertion activity there is an impulse to lower the number of machine labor hours which consequently results in decreased value of overhead, lower costs and higher profits. Under Activity-Based be the share of costs allocated directly to the products increases.Thus, the company better understand where its overhead costs go to. It enables the firm to localise the products that are not profitable and undertake relevant actions, such as decreasing costs, raising the price or withdrawing the product. However, the cost hierarchy helps to make such decision regarding not only particular products, but also batches and product lines. This undoubtedly allows making decisions that are more profit -maximizing. Moreover, in the alphabet the practical capacity is used. Therefore, it is possible to determine the groundless capacity. Diminishing the unused capacity is definitely helpful in maximizing the profits of the company. Hence, Activity-Based Costing provides the management with the information necessary to make optimal decisions. To compare, the traditional costing systems do not give such a possibility.However, the ABC method also has some flaws that may result in making a non-optimal production decision. Some of those disadvantages could be observed in the previous questions. First, the system is believed to be complicated. As noticeable in the first question choosing the proper cost driver for the particular activity might be problematic. Selecting the wrong driver could lead to biased results and consequently the decision that is not profit-maximizing. Furthermore, exhausting to maintain the cost hierarchy may also be difficult, as shown in the example of Mrs. Bows er from the Denim Finish Company. The results when the costs were determined as the batch-level where completely different than when they were analyzed to be product-level. Thus, such easily made mistakes could result in a non-optimal decision.Furthermore, as it could be seen in the second question Activity-Based Costing does not include any nonfinancial measures. Thus, even though pure financial values may show that a particular decision is profit-maximizing, it might not necessarily be the case. opposite factors, such as e.g. loss of reputation could actually result in decreased profits. Finally, the ABC method requires gathering data from the whole company, often through interviews. Hence, there is a relatively big possibility that poised data is not perfectly accurate. To sum up, the Activity-Based Costing method is quite reliable tool in making optimal production decisions, especially compared to the traditional costing systems.However, the system has to be carefully planned and implemented, because any mistakes could lead to inaccurate results. Choosing the wrong cost driver and improper grant of the costs in the cost hierarchy may result in undesired errors. Furthermore, as useful as the ABC is, the management cannot rely solely on financial values provided by the method. Before making the decision all nonfinancial factors have to be considered. Only such a consideration combined with the information supplied by the properly designed and applied Activity-Based Costing system can lead to the optimal production decision.